Skip to content

Conversation

@individual-it
Copy link
Contributor

@individual-it individual-it commented Jan 29, 2026

Description

check for placeholders %%NEXT%% and %%NEXT_PRODUCTION_VERSION%% and fail CI if there are still in the code

Related Issue

part of #1933 (comment)

Motivation and Context

make sure the placeholders are replaced with correct versions before the release

How Has This Been Tested?

🤖

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation added

@individual-it individual-it added the Type:DevOps Related to CI/CD label Jan 29, 2026
@individual-it individual-it force-pushed the checkForVersionPlaceholders branch 7 times, most recently from 7b7fc74 to 5c30541 Compare January 29, 2026 10:51
@individual-it individual-it force-pushed the checkForVersionPlaceholders branch from 5c30541 to 4a83b34 Compare January 29, 2026 10:57
@individual-it individual-it marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2026 10:58
@individual-it individual-it merged commit 663fe37 into main Jan 29, 2026
59 checks passed
@individual-it individual-it deleted the checkForVersionPlaceholders branch January 29, 2026 12:40
@micbar
Copy link
Contributor

micbar commented Jan 30, 2026

@dragonchaser @individual-it
Do we want to drop that completely?

I don't understand the current discussion. Maybe i missed something.

Wasn't it the idea to use these placeholders because we do not know the next version string ATM?

The replacement check should be done closely before the release, when we already know the next version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Type:DevOps Related to CI/CD

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants